I don't understand what this means I am struggling to understand the argument for why the introduction of a stop in susy can solve the hierarchy problem In strathdeee's extended poincare supersymmetry, the first entry on page 16 lists the massless multiplets of 6d $\\mathcal{n} = (1,0)$ supersymmetry as $2^2 = (2,1
Susy Gala : ClassyPornstars
A question in four parts
What are the main problems which supersymmetry purports to solve
What would constitute lack of evidence for susy at the proposed lhc energy scales (e.g I have an idea of supersymmetry in quantum mechanics, can you suggest a book on supersymmetry in quantum field theory, which has sufficient mathematical rigour like peskin and schroeder 4 supergravity by daniel z freedman and antoine van proeyen is quite excellent for illustrating clifford algebra techniques and calculations in the classical susy/sugra in general (in the component formalism) The book has several calculations illustrated and plenty of exercises.
However, the quadratically divergent corrections are still absent. Of the anticommutators $\ {s,q\}$ and cannot be anomalous without breaking scft. I would really recommend a study in qft before going on to study susy Qft has many quirks that make supersymmetry a very interesting expansion of the regular framework.
