The complex numbers are a field The confusing point here is that the formula $1^x = 1$ is not part of the definition of complex exponentiation, although it is an immediate consequence of the definition of natural number exponentiation. 知乎，中文互联网高质量的问答社区和创作者聚集的原创内容平台，于 2011 年 1 月正式上线，以「让人们更好的分享知识、经验和见解，找到自己的解答」为品牌使命。
Bre🎀followingback (@ily.bre) - Urlebird
It's a fundamental formula not only in arithmetic but also in the whole of math
Is there a proof for it or is it just assumed?
1080P/2K/4K分辨率，以RTX 5050为基准（25款主流游戏测试成绩取平均值） 数据来源于：TechPowerUp 桌面端显卡天梯图： How do i convince someone that $1+1=2$ may not necessarily be true I once read that some mathematicians provided a very length proof of $1+1=2$ Can you think of some way to
两边求和，我们有 ln (n+1)<1/1+1/2+1/3+1/4+……+1/n 容易的， \lim _ {n\rightarrow +\infty }\ln \left ( n+1\right) =+\infty ，所以这个和是无界的，不收敛。 1/8 1/4 3/8 1/2 5/8 3/4 7/8 英寸。 this is an arithmetic sequence since there is a common difference between each term In this case, adding 18 to the previous term in the sequence gives the next term In other words, an=a1+d (n−1)
There are infinitely many possible values for $1^i$, corresponding to different branches of the complex logarithm
