Instead of deleting a domain, i would recommend changing the name/description to indicate it is out of date. You go to edit a field's list (agol / enterprise term for a domain ), and you get this message Here is the code, everything works great (layer overwrites, capabilities are updated), but when i try to update the feature layer collection definition to create the coded value domain list, it returns:
Camilla Araujo Erome: A Trailblazer in Digital Content Creation - EROME
I am working on a python script that pulls the domain and subtype information from a feature class (or table) and uses that information to update the attribute and entity portion of the metadata
We are using the fgdc csdgm standards
While testing my code i would manually make edits to a test datas. This works, but the domain and subtype fields return codes instead of descriptions Attempting to join the gdb_items table to retrieve domain descriptions, but i couldn’t locate the domain and subtype information in ssms A way to create a sql view that returns the descriptions for domain and subtype fields instead of the codes
Guidance on how to access domain and subtype. This is a map service with feature access enabled Since this isn't hosted you'd have to update the domains in the service by either overwriting the service by republishing or using the rest api (to update the service definition I would try and find out who published it and how
You can also check the service details in arcgis server manager and to see the original.
The feature layer includes a field with a coded value domain In experience builder, we’ve set up a data view that filters records based on this field Recently, we updated the domain values in the underlying feature layer (e.g., changed or added coded values for the field) However, these changes aren’t being reflected in experience builder.
The subnetwork definition has bitwise operators that can leverage the addition of bits For example, the domain value 3—proposed and approved, is the addition of two domains, 1—proposed and 2—approved The domain assigned at the field is what is shown in the trace dialog for the network attribute That is why we have a domain that shows the values of phases for transmission and distribution
You can assign different domains per subtype, but make sure the codes are aligned, as the values for the network attribute are defined in the trace and then evaluated per feature, regardless of domain.
3 domainvalue, 1 domainvalue, 2 domainvalue, etc) Run the 'sort coded value domain' tool Has this ever happened to you
